SKILLEMALL.ai

AC crowdsec

Deploy, configure, and operate CrowdSec Security Engine, cscli, remediation components, acquisition pipelines, and AppSec WAF. Use for Linux or Docker installation, detection-to-blocking design, incident review, and safe changes. Do not use for generic firewall, Kubernetes, or reverse-proxy design; route those to the named platform skill and use this skill for CrowdSec integration.

magnus919/agent-skills Agent Skills author: magnus919 MIT 14 files body ≈ 1 576 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 27 h ago

Deploy, configure, and operate CrowdSec Security Engine, cscli, remediation components, acquisition pipelines, and AppSec WAF.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureDockerKubernetesInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 3

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 3
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell references/troubleshooting.md:31
      Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (documentation of a security skill; the skill's own vendor host)
      curl -s https://install.crowdsec.net | sudo sh
      security skillvendor-host
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/troubleshooting.md:31
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
      curl -s https://install.crowdsec.net | sudo sh
      security skill

    A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

    Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1576 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • medium 5 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 384: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (11 of 11)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.