BF product-design-and-ux
Define user-facing product behavior from validated evidence and approved scope. Use for information architecture, task flows, state and recovery models, interface contracts, usability-study plans, interaction-pattern tradeoffs, AI recommendations and generated outputs, uncertainty, human control, feedback, or engineering UX handoffs. Use after product discovery and product decisions; route WCAG/ARIA conformance work to web-accessibility and formal software specifications to spec-driven-development. Do not use this skill for unrelated requests; route to the nearest named specialist.
Define user-facing product behavior from validated evidence and approved scope.
As a process F 42/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../product-discovery/SKILL.md, ../product-methodology/SKILL.md, ../web-accessibility/SKILL.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../product-discovery/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../product-methodology/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../web-accessibility/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../spec-driven-development/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../agent-evals-and-observability/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../ai-governance/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../agent-production-operations/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../product-analytics-and-measurement/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../ai-operating-economics/SKILL.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100
- 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: ../product-discovery/SKILL.md, ../product-methodology/SKILL.md, ../web-accessibility/SKILL.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 19 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1603 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 588: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (11 of 11)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.