SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF resilience-and-recovery

Design, exercise, and evidence graceful degradation, disaster recovery, and restoration behavior across systems and dependencies. Covers failure-mode analysis, RTO/RPO decision records, restore testing, game days, failover drills, data integrity verification, and recovery communication. Do not use for live incident command or incident response; route to site-reliability-engineering for those. Do not use for infrastructure implementation details; route to platform-engineering.

magnus919/agent-skills Agent Skills author: magnus919 MIT 11 files body ≈ 3 637 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 27 h ago

Design, exercise, and evidence graceful degradation, disaster recovery, and restoration behavior across systems and dependencies.

As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../site-reliability-engineering/SKILL.md, ../platform-engineering/SKILL.md, ../release-engineering/SKILL.md

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
96
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
45/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../site-reliability-engineering/SKILL.md, ../platform-engineering/SKILL.md, ../release-engineering/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 4

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 4
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/failure-modes-and-dependencies.md:19
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Security event | Ransomware, credential leak, unauthorized access | Intrusion detection, anomaly monitoring |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/rto-rpo-decision-record.md:35
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - **Scenario:** (e.g., primary region loss, data corruption, ransomware)
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:95
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - Is the failure mode one that HA cannot handle (data corruption, logical error, region loss, ransomware)?
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:103
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - A ransomware event encrypts primary and replica data stores. The system restores from an air-gapped, immutable backup. Restore testing confirmed this capability within the RTO defined in the decisio

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../site-reliability-engineering/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../platform-engineering/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../release-engineering/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../data-engineering/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../secure-software-engineering/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../site-reliability-engineering/SKILL.md, ../platform-engineering/SKILL.md, ../release-engineering/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: ../site-reliability-engineering/SKILL.md, ../platform-engineering/SKILL.md, ../release-engineering/SKILL.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 85Steps. 32 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3637 tokens
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 480: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.