SKILLEMALL.ai

BF restic

Install, configure, operate, secure, automate, tune, troubleshoot, and recover restic backups across local, SFTP, S3-compatible, cloud, and REST backends. Use when creating or managing a restic repository, designing backup or retention policy, validating restores, handling repository health or locks, moving repositories, or building safe scheduled backup jobs. Do not use for a generic file-copy task that does not need encrypted, deduplicated snapshots.

magnus919/agent-skills Agent Skills author: magnus919 MIT 17 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 1 639 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 27 h ago

Install, configure, operate, secure, automate, tune, troubleshoot, and recover restic backups across local, SFTP, S3-compatible, cloud, and REST backends.

As a process F 39/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: templates/backup-policy.env.example, templates/systemd/restic-backup.service, templates/systemd/restic-backup.timer

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
39/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: templates/backup-policy.env.example, templates/systemd/restic-backup.service, templates/systemd/restic-backup.timer
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/security-and-threat-model.md:3
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    Use this reference whenever a task involves credentials, repository access, ransomware resistance, remote backends, or sharing recovery authority.
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/security-and-threat-model.md:22
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Endpoint ransomware | Separate credentials, least privilege, repository immutability/append-only options if appropriate, offline or independent copy |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:48
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Threat-model secrets, access, ransomware, or credentials | [security and threat model](references/security-and-threat-model.md) |

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/backup-policy.env.example
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/systemd/restic-backup.service
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/systemd/restic-backup.timer

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: templates/backup-policy.env.example, templates/systemd/restic-backup.service, templates/systemd/restic-backup.timer
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: templates/backup-policy.env.example, templates/systemd/restic-backup.service, templates/systemd/restic-backup.timer
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 85Steps. 14 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1639 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • medium 5 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 456: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)
  • +3All 4 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.