SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC traefik

Deploy, configure, and troubleshoot Traefik v3 reverse proxy — covers all providers, routing, TLS/ACME, middlewares, and production patterns with YAML examples. Load when setting up or debugging a Traefik instance. Do not use this skill for unrelated requests; route to the nearest named specialist.

magnus919/agent-skills Agent Skills author: magnus919 MIT 22 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 586 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 25 h ago

Deploy, configure, and troubleshoot Traefik v3 reverse proxy — covers all providers, routing, TLS/ACME, middlewares, and production patterns with YAML examples.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureDockerKubernetesInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/production-deployment.md:128
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - no-new-privileges:true      # Prevent privilege escalation

    Files scanned: 21. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 64): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 21 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2586 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (17 of 17)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.