SKILLEMALL.ai

AB waiting-list

Design and build waiting-list portals for anticipated goods or services: classify whether the experience needs interest capture, verified early access, referral growth, a virtual waiting room, appointment backfill, or scarce-item allocation; choose a reversible architecture; and define the state machine, abuse controls, consent and email lifecycle, fairness, observability, and release gates. Optionally validate supplied email and phone contacts with expiring magic links or provider-managed verification, then feed eligible, consented records to a runtime-configured CRM adapter. Use for prelaunch signups, beta access, launches, bookings, reservations, traffic-spike queues, and premium or cinematic campaign experiences. Do not use for generic landing-page copy, ordinary CRM or email operations, or checkout and inventory systems in isolation; route those parts to the appropriate specialist skill.

magnus919/agent-skills Agent Skills author: magnus919 MIT 16 files body ≈ 4 433 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 25 h ago

Design and build waiting-list portals for anticipated goods or services: classify whether the experience needs interest capture, verified early access…

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

GeneratorSales and CRMInfrastructureMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4433 tokens
    • 85Steps. 34 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Description length 905: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 9)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.