AC prd-master
PRD writing and product definition expert. Use when writing PRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria, or prioritizing features. Covers RICE/MoSCoW frameworks, agile requirements, and specification best practices.
PRD writing and product definition expert.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitytemplates/prd-template.md:537Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Mitigation:** Regular security audits, penetration testing
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3294 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 211: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 28 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.