SKILLEMALL.ai

BC cmux-billing

Stripe checkout, pricing, subscription, Pro plan, webhook, and entitlement runbook for cmux billing work. Use when editing or debugging billing, pricing, Stripe Checkout, subscription recording, Pro plan status, webhooks, entitlement metadata, or pricing dev/prod tooling.

manaflow-ai/cmux Agent Skills author: manaflow-ai NOASSERTION 1 file body ≈ 3 019 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Stripe checkout, pricing, subscription, Pro plan, webhook, and entitlement runbook for cmux billing work.

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureStripeCommerceSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:38
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      Prices live in `web/services/billing/plans.ts` and are provisioned by `web/scripts/stripe/provision-catalog.sh`. Current checkout keys: `cmux…-10` ($10/mo), `cmux…-50` ($50/mo), `
      quoted

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 8, 34, 36): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 19 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3019 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 272: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.