SKILLEMALL.ai

CF cmux-dev-workflow

Contributor workflow for native cmux setup, tagged dev builds, Xcode project normalization and sidebar extensions. Use for native build inputs, setup or tagged app verification.

manaflow-ai/cmux Agent Skills author: manaflow-ai NOASSERTION 5 files body ≈ 659 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Contributor workflow for native cmux setup, tagged dev builds, Xcode project normalization and sidebar extensions.

As a process F 34/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/contributor-verification.md, ../cmux-testing/references/local-vs-ci-validation.md, ../cmux-architecture/references/swift-6-0-compatibility.md

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
34/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/contributor-verification.md, ../cmux-testing/references/local-vs-ci-validation.md, ../cmux-architecture/references/swift-6-0-compatibility.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/contributor-verification.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../cmux-testing/references/local-vs-ci-validation.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../cmux-architecture/references/swift-6-0-compatibility.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/contributor-verification.md, ../cmux-testing/references/local-vs-ci-validation.md, ../cmux-architecture/references/swift-6-0-compatibility.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/contributor-verification.md, ../cmux-testing/references/local-vs-ci-validation.md, ../cmux-architecture/references/swift-6-0-compatibility.md
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 659 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 177: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.