CF deploying-scalable-agents
Take a working agent prototype to a scalable, observable production deployment on Microsoft Foundry. Covers deployment patterns, the agent lifecycle, model routing, response caching, evaluation gates, human approval, OpenTelemetry observability, cost optimisation, and smoke-testing deployed agents.
Take a working agent prototype to a scalable, observable production deployment on Microsoft Foundry.
As a process F 33/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../../16-deploying-scalable-agents/README.md, ../../../16-deploying-scalable-agents/code_samples/16-python-agent-framework.ipynb, ../../../../../.github/workflows/smoke-test.yml
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../16-deploying-scalable-agents/README.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../16-deploying-scalable-agents/code_samples/16-python-agent-framework.ipynb - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../../../.github/workflows/smoke-test.yml - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../tests/README.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../16-deploying-scalable-agents/README.md, ../../../16-deploying-scalable-agents/code_samples/16-python-agent-framework.ipynb, ../../../../../.github/workflows/smoke-test.yml
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1578 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 52.