DD testing-course-samples
(no description)
The skill promises training materials on AI agents, but contains only a single folder with no description. Content quality scores 24 out of 100—that's low. The check found broken links and missing files, so parts simply won't load. No critical security issues, but there's nothing to structure: no scripts, no code examples, just a Microsoft header.
Don't install it. The skill is in draft state—the instruction itself is missing. The author needs to populate the content and fix the links first.
Microsoft Foundry / Azure OpenAI அமைப்பின் மீது பாடக் குறிப்புகள் மற்றும் குறியீட்டு மாதிரிகள் இயங்குகிறதா என்றதை சரிபார்க்கவும்.
As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../../../../scripts/validate-notebooks.ps1, ../../../tests/README.md, ../../../../../.env.example
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../../../scripts/validate-notebooks.ps1 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../tests/README.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../../../.env.example - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/validate-notebooks.ps1
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../../../scripts/validate-notebooks.ps1, ../../../tests/README.md, ../../../../../.env.example
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Steps. 13 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1281 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 24.