SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF design-native-extension-feature

Capture a 2-3 line pitch from the user, draft a product overview (PRD.md) and a technical design (ARCHITECTURE.md) for a third-party `.ppmplugin` native control, then walk through every operation's iOS + Android implementation strategy with opinionated recommendations (library choice, hosting, key APIs, edge cases) and capture the agreed spec in ARCHITECTURE.md §3.<n>. The depth of ARCHITECTURE.md is what lets the scaffold skill generate complete working code instead of TODO placeholders. Iterates with the user until they approve both docs. Optionally seeds from a design doc / FRD URL. PRD.md + ARCHITECTURE.md are the source of truth for every downstream skill (generate, build, assemble). Run this BEFORE any code is generated.

microsoft/power-platform-skills Agent Skills author: microsoft 1 file body ≈ 12 329 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Capture a 2-3 line pitch from the user, draft a product overview (PRD.md) and a technical design (ARCHITECTURE.md) for a third-party .ppmplugin native…

As a process F 46/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md, ../../shared/prereq-check.md, ../../shared/naming-conventions.md

GeneratorSoftware developmentDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
75/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
45
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
46/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md, ../../shared/prereq-check.md, ../../shared/naming-conventions.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Glob Grep WebFetch AskUserQuestion Skill

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 12329 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/prereq-check.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/naming-conventions.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/ppmplugin-format.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/error-codes.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/framework-recommendations.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/self-critique-protocol.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/repo-layout.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md, ../../shared/prereq-check.md, ../../shared/naming-conventions.md
  • 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md, ../../shared/prereq-check.md, ../../shared/naming-conventions.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 12329 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 81 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (19 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 736: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 81 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 45.