SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF generate-ppmplugin-manifest

Validate, reconcile to the chosen target(s), and stage the `manifest.json` for a `.ppmplugin` bundle. In the normal flow the committed `./manifest.json` already exists (authored by /generate-native-extension), so this stage reads it, runs the plugin's upload-compatibility checks locally as a pre-flight gate (name regex, canonical prefix, known incompatible names, method and identifier shapes), reconciles `entrypoints` down to the platform(s) you ship, and writes the gitignored staged copy `ppmplugin/staging/manifest.json` that /assemble-ppmplugin zips. If no committed manifest exists (a hand-authored module) it falls back to deriving every field from the class name and Android module source, writing both the committed file and the staged copy. No toolchain — pure read, validate, write. Target-aware. Run after the native module exists, before the build skills.

microsoft/power-platform-skills Agent Skills author: microsoft 1 file body ≈ 4 511 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Validate, reconcile to the chosen target(s), and stage the manifest.json for a .ppmplugin bundle. In the normal flow the committed ./manifest.json already…

As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../generate-native-extension/SKILL.md, ../../shared/ppmplugin-format.md, ../build-android-binary/SKILL.md

AnalyzerFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
57
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
44/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../generate-native-extension/SKILL.md, ../../shared/ppmplugin-format.md, ../build-android-binary/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Glob Grep AskUserQuestion Skill

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../generate-native-extension/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/ppmplugin-format.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../build-android-binary/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../assemble-ppmplugin/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/shared-instructions.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/naming-conventions.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared/repo-layout.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../generate-native-extension/SKILL.md, ../../shared/ppmplugin-format.md, ../build-android-binary/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: ../generate-native-extension/SKILL.md, ../../shared/ppmplugin-format.md, ../build-android-binary/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4511 tokens
  • 100Steps. 42 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (15 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 871: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.