CB create-site
Creates a new Power Pages site from an SPA or non-SPA template, or scaffolds an SPA from scratch using React, Angular, Vue, or Astro. Guides requirements discovery, template selection, provisioning, design, validation, and deployment. Use when the user wants to create, build, use a template for, or scaffold a new Power Pages website or portal.
Creates a new Power Pages site from an SPA or non-SPA template, or scaffolds an SPA from scratch using React, Angular, Vue, or Astro.
As a process B 77/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, execution cost
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Write Edit Grep Glob Bash WebSearch AskUserQuestion Task TaskCreate TaskUpdate TaskList Skill mcp__plugin_power-pages_playwright__browser_navigate mcp__plugin_power-pages_playwrigh
Files scanned: 45. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 39203 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 77/100
- 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 39203 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Steps. 274 steps, 5 vague phrases
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 24 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (44 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 345: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 57 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 274 items
- +4Has examples (60 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.