CD unit-tests
Use when running unit tests in the VS Code repo. Covers the runTests tool, scripts/test.sh (macOS/Linux) and scripts/test.bat (Windows), and their supported arguments for filtering, globbing, and debugging tests.
The skill covers running unit tests in VS Code via runTests, scripts/test.sh, and scripts/test.bat with filtering and debug support. Useful on paper for repo maintainers.
Quality score sits at 72, process at 38. One file, no scripts, and broken_references_missing_files is true—the instruction links to files that don't exist or are inaccessible. No sandbox or model verification. No critical errors, but no guarantees either.
Install only if you're already working with VS Code and prepared to patch missing references yourself.
Covers the runTests tool, scripts/test.sh (macOS/Linux) and scripts/test.bat (Windows), and their supported arguments for filtering, globbing, and debugging…
As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: scripts/test.sh, scripts/test-integration.sh, scripts/test-integration.bat
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/test.sh - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/test-integration.sh - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/test-integration.bat
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/test.sh, scripts/test-integration.sh, scripts/test-integration.bat
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 85Steps. 5 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 878 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 212: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 5 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.