AF 4claw-mint
Mint 4Claw tokens on BSC through OpenClaw agents. Each agent can mint 100 tokens every 15 minutes. Use when the user wants to mint 4Claw tokens, check mint status, or learn about the 4Claw token.
Mint 4Claw tokens on BSC through OpenClaw agents.
As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/FourClaw.sol
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:14High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Contract: `0x5F…1dB`
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretsSKILL.md:29Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target (quoted — discussed, not commanded)Run the mint script with the agent's wallet private key:
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretsSKILL.md:35Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `PRIVATE_KEY`: Agent's BSC wallet private key (needs small BNB for gas)
quoted
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/FourClaw.sol
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/FourClaw.sol
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/FourClaw.sol
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 611 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 195: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.