SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD SOC 2 Compliance Accelerator

Your agent for achieving and maintaining SOC 2 Type I and Type II compliance — from readiness assessment through audit completion.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 2 files body ≈ 2 599 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Your agent for achieving and maintaining SOC 2 Type I and Type II compliance — from readiness assessment through audit completion.

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubSecurityAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:95
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    8. **Vulnerability Management**: Regular scanning, patch cadence (critical <72hrs), penetration testing
    detector

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (SOC 2 Compliance Accelerator) differs from the folder (afrexai-soc2-compliance)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 65 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2599 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 130: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 65 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.