BC tinman
AI security scanner with active prevention - 168 detection patterns, 288 attack probes, safer/risky/yolo modes, agent self-protection via /tinman check, local Oilcan event streaming, and plain-language dashboard setup via /tinman oilcan
AI security scanner with active prevention - 168 detection patterns, 288 attack probes, safer/risky/yolo modes, agent self-protection via /tinman check, local…
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 9
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 9
-
medium Exfiltration
intent-browser-credential-storetinman_runner.py:533Accesses a browser credential / cookie store (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"browser_data": ["Cookies", "Login Data", "Chrome", "Firefox", "Safari", "Brave"],
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretstinman_runner.py:529Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"seed phrase",
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretstinman_runner.py:531Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"recovery phrase",
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypasstinman_runner.py:555Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (string literal in code, not executed)"-executionpolicy bypass",
code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processtinman_runner.py:589Starts a background / autostarted process (string literal in code, not executed)"systemctl enable",
code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegetinman_runner.py:631Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)"privilege_escalation": ["sudo", "chmod 777", "chmod +x", "chown", "setuid"],
code literal
A further 3 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "repository" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requires" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "install" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "permissions"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (tinman) differs from the folder (agent-tinman)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2329 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 236: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.