AC ai-workforce
Turn an OpenClaw agent into an autonomous AI Chief that runs a business. Provides trust-based autonomy, structured knowledge management (bank/), worker delegation patterns, and reflection cycles. Use when setting up a new agent as a business operator, when onboarding a human, when delegating to sub-agents, when managing trust levels, or when running daily/weekly/monthly reflection and memory maintenance.
Turn an OpenClaw agent into an autonomous AI Chief that runs a business.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6158 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6158 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 114 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 407: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 32 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 114 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.