SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF anytype

Interact with Anytype via anytype-cli and its HTTP API. Use when reading, creating, updating, or searching objects/pages in Anytype spaces; managing spaces; or automating Anytype workflows. Covers first-time setup (account creation, service start, space joining, API key) and ongoing API usage.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 3 files body ≈ 552 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Interact with Anytype via anytype-cli and its HTTP API.

As a process F 28/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

IntegrationSoftware developmentPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
28/100
Will not run
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration read-dotenv SKILL.md:49
      Reads a .env file (detector / deny-list definition)
      env = dict(l.strip().split('=',1) for l in open('/root/.openclaw/workspace/.env') if '=' in l and not l.startswith('#'))
      detector

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 28/100

    • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 552 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 294: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.