SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC auto-animate

Zero-config animations for React, Vue, Solid, Svelte, Preact with @formkit/auto-animate (3.28kb). Prevents 15 documented errors including React 19 StrictMode bugs, SSR imports, conditional parents, viewport issues, drag & drop conflicts, and CSS transform bugs. Use when: animating lists/accordions/toasts, troubleshooting SSR animation errors, React 19 StrictMode issues, or need accessible drop-in transitions with auto prefers-reduced-motion.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 17 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 2 838 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Zero-config animations for React, Vue, Solid, Svelte, Preact with @formkit/auto-animate (3.28kb). Prevents 15 documented errors including React 19 StrictMode…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorGitHubWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 8 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2838 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • -44 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 446: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 27 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.