SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC autonomous-agent

CreditNexus x402 agent. Use when the user wants stock predictions, backtests, bank linking, or agent/borrower scores. Payment-protected MCP tools (run_prediction, run_backtest, link_bank_account, get_agent_reputation_score, get_borrower_score, and by-email variants) with x402 flow (Aptos + Base). Agent handles 402 → pay → retry autonomously. Supports wallet attestation (signing) for onboarding.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 800 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

CreditNexus x402 agent.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 2 more places: skill-library-mcp, skill-library-mcp

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 800 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 397: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.