AB better-ralph
Run one Better Ralph iteration: PRD-driven autonomous coding. Read prd.json, pick next story, implement it, run checks, commit, mark story passed, append progress. Uses only standard OpenClaw tools (read, write, exec, git). Triggers on: run better ralph, better ralph iteration, do one ralph story, next prd story, ralph loop.
Run one Better Ralph iteration: PRD-driven autonomous coding.
As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, git, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1506 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 326: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.