AC bizcard
Business card scanner + Google Contacts manager. Auto-detects business card images, extracts contact info via OCR (imageModel), confirms with user, saves to Google Contacts with configurable name format and card photo. Trigger: image that looks like a business card, or keywords "명함", "bizcard", "연락처 저장". Settings: /bizcard config
Business card scanner + Google Contacts manager.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Broad scope
meta-agent-memory-dumptemplates/SOUL.mdAgent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokenstemplates/SOUL.md
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:38Writes to a shell startup file (documentation of a security skill)echo 'export MATON_API_KEY="your-key-here"' >> ~/.zshrc
security skill
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4347 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -232 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 331: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 49 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.