SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB blockchain-developer

Build production-ready Web3 applications, smart contracts, and decentralized systems. Implements DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, DAOs, and enterprise blockchain integrations. Use PROACTIVELY for smart contracts, Web3 apps, DeFi protocols, or blockchain infrastructure.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 374 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Build production-ready Web3 applications, smart contracts, and decentralized systems.

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorInfrastructureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:151
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Smart contract vulnerability assessment and penetration testing

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 137 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2374 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 267: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 137 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.