SKILLEMALL.ai

BC bloom

Discover your supporter personality and find AI tools you'll love. Get personalized recommendations, connect with your first 100 supporters, and search for skills that match how you work. For indie devs, vibe coders, and AI builders.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 3 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 359 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Discover your supporter personality and find AI tools you'll love.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureGitHubSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration read-dotenv execute.sh:48
    Reads a .env file (code comment)
    # Copy .env.example if it exists
    comment

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "command-dispatch"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "permissions"

Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 85Steps. 51 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2359 tokens
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -240 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 233: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.