SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC build-with-public-writer

Systematically build a "Build with Public" technical blog writing workflow, including directory architecture, version management, multi-angle approaches, link sharing, and complete toolchain

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 3 files · 1 script body ≈ 4 700 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Systematically build a "Build with Public" technical blog writing workflow, including directory architecture, version management, multi-angle approaches, link…

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, running it twice

ProcedureOutlookSoftware developmentWriting and documentsLearningtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process scripts/bwp.sh:94
      Starts a background / autostarted process
      nohup python server.py > logs/server.log 2>&1 &

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 21 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4700 tokens
    • 85Steps. 80 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 190: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 52 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 80 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (25 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.