SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB calibre-catalog-read

Read Calibre catalog data via calibredb over a Content server, and run one-book analysis workflow that writes HTML analysis block back to comments while caching analysis state in SQLite. Use for list/search/id lookups and AI reading pipeline for a selected book.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 11 files body ≈ 2 293 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Read Calibre catalog data via calibredb over a Content server, and run one-book analysis workflow that writes HTML analysis block back to comments while…

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:17
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - `subagent-spawn-command-builder` installed (for spawn payload generation).

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 76 steps
    • 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2293 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 262: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 6 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.