SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC chat-history-analyzer

Extracts and analyzes Cursor IDE chat history to identify key discoveries, obstacles, and solutions, saving findings to the journal.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 5 files body ≈ 876 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Extracts and analyzes Cursor IDE chat history to identify key discoveries, obstacles, and solutions, saving findings to the journal.

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches

AnalyzerPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention SKILL.md:78
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    # Add to crontab (crontab -e)

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"

Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 876 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 132: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.