SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC checkly-cli-skills

Comprehensive Checkly CLI command reference and Monitoring as Code workflows. Use when user mentions Checkly CLI, monitoring as code, synthetic monitoring, API checks, browser checks, Playwright testing, check deployment, or npx checkly commands. Routes to specialized sub-skills for auth, config, checks, testing, deployment, imports, constructs, and advanced patterns. Triggers on checkly, monitoring as code, synthetic monitoring, checkly cli, npx checkly.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 17 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 2 304 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Comprehensive Checkly CLI command reference and Monitoring as Code workflows.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedurePlaywrightInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requirements"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 57 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2304 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -34 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 459: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 21 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.