AB cmc-api-exchange
API reference for CoinMarketCap exchange endpoints including exchange info, volume, market pairs, and assets. Use this skill whenever the user mentions exchange API, asks about exchange volumes, wants trading pair data, needs proof-of-reserves info, or is building exchange integrations. This is the authoritative reference for CMC exchange API questions. Trigger: "exchange API", "CMC exchange data", "trading pairs API", "exchange volume API", "/cmc-api-exchange"
API reference for CoinMarketCap exchange endpoints including exchange info, volume, market pairs, and assets.
As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash Read
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/assets.md:72High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"wallet_address": "0x28…d60",
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/assets.md:106High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"wallet_address": "0x28…d60",
quoted
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 23 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1193 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 465: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.