SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD cofounder-im

Pull startup project data and AI-generated build specifications from CoFounder.im. Use when a user wants to build a project that was validated and planned on CoFounder.im — lists projects, fetches the full build spec (tech stack, MVP plan, UI/UX, implementation plan, OpenClaw builder output), and helps orchestrate sub-agents to build it. Trigger phrases — "build my CoFounder project", "pull my project from cofounder.im", "use my CoFounder build spec", "start building from CoFounder", "fetch my startup plan", "build from cofounder".

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 2 files body ≈ 2 778 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Pull startup project data and AI-generated build specifications from CoFounder.im. Use when a user wants to build a project that was validated and planned on…

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorPostgreSQLAI and agentsData and analyticsDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 47 steps, 3 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2778 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 537: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.