AC competitor-docs
Search and analyze competitor documentation archives using full-text search (FTS). Use when you need to find information in structured documentation folders containing articles with source URLs (marked with "*Source:" pattern). Provides fast BM25-ranked search across thousands of articles with automatic source URL extraction for citations. Ideal for competitive intelligence research, feature comparisons, and documentation lookups. Requires indexing documentation first with `docs.py index`.
Search and analyze competitor documentation archives using full-text search (FTS).
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/ci-patterns.md:85Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)# Ransomware
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/ci-patterns.md:86Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)scripts/search_docs.py ./docs "ransomware\|immutable\|air.?gap" --mode regex
quoted
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1349 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 494: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 6 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.