BF content-machina
Full-stack content creation persona for OpenClaw agents. Transforms any agent into a content powerhouse — research, write, repurpose, and publish across platforms. Use when: (1) writing blog posts, articles, newsletters, (2) repurposing content across Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, (3) building a content calendar, (4) researching topics and summarizing findings, (5) writing with a consistent brand voice, (6) generating content ideas in bulk, (7) scoring and improving content quality. The Content Machine remembers your brand, learns what works, and ships content that actually performs.
Full-stack content creation persona for OpenClaw agents.
As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: content-machina.png
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-agent-memory-dumpmemory/content-machine-novaiok.mdAgent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokensmemory/content-machine-novaiok.md
Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: content-machina.png
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: content-machina.png
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 52 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1179 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 600: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 9)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.