SKILLEMALL.ai

AF content-quality-auditor

Use when the user asks to "audit content quality", "EEAT score", "content quality check", "CORE-EEAT audit", "how good is my content", "is my content good enough to rank", "EEAT check", or "rate my content quality". Runs a full CORE-EEAT 80-item content quality audit, scoring content across 8 dimensions with weighted scoring by content type. Produces a detailed report with per-item scores, dimension analysis, and a prioritized action plan. For SEO-specific page checks, see on-page-seo-auditor. For domain-level assessment, see domain-authority-auditor.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 4 734 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 3 d ago

Use when the user asks to "audit content quality", "EEAT score", "content quality check", "CORE-EEAT audit", "how good is my content", "is my content good…

As a process F 53/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md, ../../research/keyword-research/, ../../research/competitor-analysis/

AnalyzerData and analyticsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
53/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md, ../../research/keyword-research/, ../../research/competitor-analysis/
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../research/keyword-research/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../research/competitor-analysis/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../research/serp-analysis/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../research/content-gap-analysis/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../build/seo-content-writer/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../build/geo-content-optimizer/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../build/meta-tags-optimizer/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../build/schema-markup-generator/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../optimize/on-page-seo-auditor/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../optimize/technical-seo-checker/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../optimize/internal-linking-optimizer/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../optimize/content-refresher/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../monitor/rank-tracker/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../monitor/backlink-analyzer/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../monitor/performance-reporter/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../monitor/alert-manager/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../domain-authority-auditor/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../entity-optimizer/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../memory-management/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../CONNECTORS.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md, ../../research/keyword-research/, ../../research/competitor-analysis/
  • 0Tools and files. 21 referenced file(s) missing: ../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md, ../../research/keyword-research/, ../../research/competitor-analysis/
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4734 tokens
  • 100Steps. 49 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 8 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 557: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.