SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC council-builder

Build a personalized team of AI agent personas for OpenClaw. Interviews the user, analyzes their workflow, then creates specialized agents with distinct personalities, adaptive model routing (Fast/Think/Deep/Strategic), weekly learning metrics, visual architecture docs, and inter-agent coordination. USE WHEN: user wants to create an agent team/council, build specialized AI personas, set up multi-agent workflows, 'build me a team of agents', 'create agents for my workflow', 'set up an agent council', 'I want specialized AI assistants', 'build me a crew'. DON'T USE WHEN: user wants a single skill (use skill-creator), wants to install existing skills (use clawhub), or wants to chat with existing agents (just route to them).

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 13 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 692 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Build a personalized team of AI agent personas for OpenClaw.

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 85Steps. 68 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1692 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 730: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 5)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.