SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC creative-ops-copilot

Turn messy client briefs into a production-ready plan for motion design/VFX projects: scope, assumptions/exclusions, deliverables matrix, schedule/milestones, review rounds, and estimate/quote. Also generate an invoice draft payload for Chris's local invoicing system (invoicing_system_2025) or export quote/invoice JSON/CSV/Markdown. Use when Chris asks to go from brief/email notes/chat logs into a clear plan + quote/invoice, or to create a repeatable project folder + docs.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 3 files body ≈ 712 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Turn messy client briefs into a production-ready plan for motion design/VFX projects: scope, assumptions/exclusions, deliverables matrix, schedule/milestones…

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 85Steps. 45 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 712 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 477: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.