SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC cybersec-helper

Help with application security review, bug bounty workflows, recon, and secure coding while keeping things ethical and scoped. Think critically, use real sources only, and reference OWASP.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 849 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Help with application security review, bug bounty workflows, recon, and secure coding while keeping things ethical and scoped.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmentSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
96
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 4

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 4
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:3
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      description: Help with application security review, bug bounty workflows, recon, and secure coding while keeping things ethical and scoped. Think critically, use real sources only, and reference OWASP
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:9
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - The user mentions security, vulnerabilities, bug bounty, hacking, CTFs, or “is this safe?”.
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:11
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - You are helping plan or document a bug bounty report.
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:43
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - **HackerOne/Bugcrowd writeups** for real-world bug bounty examples.

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 85Steps. 47 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 849 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4Structure: 2 headings, hard to scan
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 188: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.