BC emperor-claw-os
Operate the Emperor Claw control plane as the Manager for an AI workforce: interpret goals into projects, claim and complete tasks, manage agents, incidents, SLAs, and tactics, and call the Emperor Claw MCP endpoints for all state changes.
Operate the Emperor Claw control plane as the Manager for an AI workforce: interpret goals into projects, claim and complete tasks, manage agents, incidents…
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, execution cost
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 10228 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 10228 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 270 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (19 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 239: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 76 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 270 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (57 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.