BC fathom
Connect to Fathom AI to fetch call recordings, transcripts, and summaries. Use when user asks about their meetings, call history, or wants to search past conversations.
Connect to Fathom AI to fetch call recordings, transcripts, and summaries.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/list-calls.sh:62Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)RESPONSE=$(curl -s -H "X-API-Key: $API_KEY" "$URL")
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/search-calls.sh:64Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)RESPONSE=$(curl -s -H "X-API-Key: $API_KEY" "$URL")
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/setup-webhook.sh:96Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)echo " curl -X DELETE -H \"X-API-Key: \$API_KEY\" \\"
quoted
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "read_when"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 75Steps. 3 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 852 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 168: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +3All 6 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.