BF financial-data-visualization
Patterns for building dark-themed financial charts and data visualizations. Covers chart theming, color scales for gains/losses, and real-time data display. Use when building trading dashboards or financial analytics. Triggers on chart theme, data visualization, financial chart, dark theme, gains losses, trading UI.
Patterns for building dark-themed financial charts and data visualizations.
As a process F 37/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../meta/design-system-creation/, ../animated-financial-display/, ../../realtime/dual-stream-architecture/
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../meta/design-system-creation/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../animated-financial-display/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../realtime/dual-stream-architecture/
Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../meta/design-system-creation/, ../animated-financial-display/, ../../realtime/dual-stream-architecture/
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (financial-data-visualization) differs from the folder (financial-design-systems)
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2202 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.