SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC firmware-analyst

Expert firmware analyst specializing in embedded systems, IoT security, and hardware reverse engineering. Masters firmware extraction, analysis, and vulnerability research for routers, IoT devices, automotive systems, and industrial controllers. Use PROACTIVELY for firmware security audits, IoT penetration testing, or embedded systems research.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 909 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Expert firmware analyst specializing in embedded systems, IoT security, and hardware reverse engineering.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerSecuritySoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:7
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      audits, IoT penetration testing, or embedded systems research.
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:301
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Bug bounty programs

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1909 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 346: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 50 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.