SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD gcp-fullstack

Full-stack super agent for projects on Google Cloud Platform with GitHub and Cloudflare — covers scaffolding, compute, database, auth, deploy, CDN, and security

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 2 files body ≈ 6 778 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Full-stack super agent for projects on Google Cloud Platform with GitHub and Cloudflare — covers scaffolding, compute, database, auth, deploy, CDN, and security

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubGoogle CloudCloudflareDockerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
60
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6778 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 39 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, git, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6778 tokens
  • 85Steps. 38 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 160: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 57 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +4Has examples (43 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.