SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC glab

GitLab CLI for managing issues, merge requests, CI/CD pipelines, and repositories. Use when: (1) Creating, reviewing, or merging MRs, (2) Managing GitLab issues, (3) Monitoring or triggering CI/CD pipelines, (4) Working with self-hosted GitLab instances, (5) Automating GitLab workflows from the command line. Requires GITLAB_TOKEN (recommend minimal scopes). The `glab api` command enables arbitrary API calls - use read-only tokens when possible.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 6 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 252 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

GitLab CLI for managing issues, merge requests, CI/CD pipelines, and repositories.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureGitLabInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-shell-rc references/troubleshooting.md:488
      Writes to a shell startup file (security demo / example)
      echo 'export GITLAB_HOST=gitlab.example.org' >> ~/.bashrc
      demo

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 21 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1252 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 448: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.