SKILLEMALL.ai

BB google-tasks

Fetch, display, create, and delete Google Tasks using the Google Tasks API. Use when the user asks to check, view, list, get, add, create, remove, or delete their Google Tasks, to-do lists, or task items. Handles OAuth authentication automatically using bash script with curl and jq.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 13 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 759 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Fetch, display, create, and delete Google Tasks using the Google Tasks API.

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorData and analyticsSoftware developmentPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
75
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Exfiltration medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 5

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 5
    • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/create_task.sh:64
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
      LISTS=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
    • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/delete_task.sh:38
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
      LISTS=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
    • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/delete_task.sh:61
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
      TASKS=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
    • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/get_tasks.sh:28
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
      LISTS=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
    • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/get_tasks.sh:49
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
      TASKS=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \

    Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "keywords"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 759 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -34 of 7 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 283: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.