SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC gsd

Get Shit Done - Full project planning and execution workflow. Handles project initialization with deep context gathering, automated research, roadmap creation, phase planning, and execution with verification.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 80 files body ≈ 2 178 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Get Shit Done - Full project planning and execution workflow.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureOperations and projectsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process references/ccr-integration.md:178
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    nohup bash .planning/autopilot.sh > .planning/logs/autopilot.log 2>&1 &
  • low Broad scope meta-dynamic-shell templates/discovery.md:22
    Shell command executed automatically when the skill loads (Claude Code !`cmd` preamble)
    !`date +%Y-%m-%d`

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 96 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2178 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 208: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 96 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 15)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.