SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC humanizer-pl

Usuwa ślady pisania AI z polskiego tekstu. Używaj przy edycji lub przeglądaniu tekstu, aby brzmiał bardziej naturalnie i po ludzku. Oparte na przewodniku Wikipedii „Signs of AI writing" oraz wzorcach specyficznych dla polszczyzny. Wykrywa i naprawia: napuszanie znaczenia, język promocyjny, powierzchowne analizy z imiesłowami, niejasne przypisania, nadużycie myślników, regułę trzech, słownictwo AI, negatywne paralelizmy i nadmierne frazy łączące.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 2 files body ≈ 4 770 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Usuwa ślady pisania AI z polskiego tekstu.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4770 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 449: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 40 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.