AC image-process
Image processing tool for compression, background removal/replacement, and upscaling. Invoke when user wants to compress image, remove background, change background, or enlarge image.
Image processing tool for compression, background removal/replacement, and upscaling.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:69High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…Wwy+ghLE…vfU/YnxW…fdg==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:121High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…g8l+lMts…kjn+hp+Yv3g==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:190High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…FSj+bWLt…2sH/Kn8E…h6w==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:234High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…ykh+CeBd…VHy+moaqkpL/jqQq…W4A==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:265High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…oDP+fZsw/ZerEMsW/pyzsRbElpsL/DBVW…5Eg==",
detector
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 860 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 183: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.