SKILLEMALL.ai

BF competitor-alternatives

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 4 923 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement.

As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: /alternatives/notion, /alternatives/airtable, /alternatives/monday

GeneratorNotionAirtableMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
45/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: /alternatives/notion, /alternatives/airtable, /alternatives/monday
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /alternatives/notion
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /alternatives/airtable
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /alternatives/monday
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /alternatives/notion-alternatives
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /alternatives/airtable-alternatives
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /alternatives/monday-alternatives
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /compare/notion-vs-airtable
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /compare/notion-vs-monday
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /compare/airtable-vs-monday

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: /alternatives/notion, /alternatives/airtable, /alternatives/monday
  • 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: /alternatives/notion, /alternatives/airtable, /alternatives/monday
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4923 tokens
  • 100Steps. 174 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 509: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 47 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 174 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.